5 Myths About Telematics Migration and What Really Happens

Published: · Last updated: ·

Car Sharing, Technology

Car sharing fleet lined up for telematics migration

Many car sharing operators delay switching telematics providers because migration feels like a high-risk, high-effort project. But most worries about downtime, cost, and technical complexity don’t usually happen as expected. This article breaks down five common myths about telematics migration and shows what a well-prepared rollout actually looks like.

The Migration You Keep Postponing

You know when your telematics setup is overdue for an upgrade. You may even ran a pilot. Results were convincing, the new platform is clearly better, and yet the switch keeps getting delayed.

This hesitation is common across operators of every size. And in many cases, their concerns are based on a picture of migration that does not match how well-managed projects really work. Here are five myths worth setting straight.

Myth 1: Migration Means Your Entire Fleet Goes Offline

  • Reality: Only the vehicles actively being migrated go offline. The rest of your fleet is available for bookings.

Operators often think of a weekend when every vehicle gets new telematics at once. They worry all vehicles will be offline, bookings will stop, and the support requests will pile up. But this is not how a well-prepared migrations work.

Vehicles migrate to the new platform in waves. Old and new platforms run in parallel until each vehicle is confirmed live on the new system. If any problems occur, your team can intervene before moving on to the next wave.

Myth 2: The API Rebuild Will Take Months

  • Reality: With the right documentation and support, most operators finish in a matter of weeks.

The assumption is that rebuilding the API integration will need developer resources for several months. In reality, the timeline depends on three factors:

  • Access to full API documentation before you sign
  • The ability to start development earlyDedicated integration support from the tech provider during the build

It is important to start the software migration before swapping hardware. The platform needs to support both APIs at the same time before moving any vehicles. Getting the software side moving in parallel with planning is what keeps the overall timeline under control.

White Paper on Telematics Migration

Looking for More Insights?

Our Latest White Paper shows why telematics migration isn’t as hard as you think.

Get your copy

Myth 3: Migration Is a One-Time Event

  • Reality: Migration is a phased process, not a single cutover moment.

Switching systems isn’t as simple as flipping a switch. The entire migration is broken down into manageable steps. Successful migrations follow a clear structure:

  • Planning: Fleet audit, API mapping, wave definition, rollback plan
  • Execution: Vehicles move in batches with clear criteria between each wave
  • Handover: Old platform decommissioned, data flow validated from every vehicle

During execution, both platforms run simultaneously. Your systems need to route the right commands to the right unit for each vehicle. Carefully managing that data layer prevents the errors that stall a rollout mid-project.

Myth 4: Migration Is Too Expensive to Justify

  • Reality: The cost of staying is just as real, it just doesn’t appear on a migration budget.

You can see the costs of migration, but the ongoing costs of a system that isn’t working well are less obvious. Here’s what accumulates week after week on a system that is not going to improve:

  • Lost bookings when vehicles go offline due to aging hardware
  • Bad reviews when customers cannot start a rental
  • Staff time absorbed by recurring support tickets

The numbers after switching tell a different story. Here are two examples of what operators who migrated to INVERS CloudBoxx reported:

  • Flexicar: ~75% reduction in dead battery replacements per week across the fleet
  • Flinkster: Over 87% reduction in on-site interventions to manually unlock vehicles per month

These savings don’t show up in a migration budget, but they will become visible quickly once the new system is live.

Myth 5: You Need a Large Team to Pull It Off

  • Reality: The right tooling matters more than headcount.

When teilAuto migrated 2,200 vehicles across multiple German cities, they completed the project in three months with a lean operations team. How did they do it?

  • Every vehicle record was pre-configured before installers arrived on site
  • Installers used an app to accept jobs, follow step-by-step guidance, and complete a digital function test per vehicle
  • The operations team monitored live progress across the entire rollout in real time

They kept up a steady pace of 160 vehicles per week, without needing to grow their back-office team.

Simplify Your Telematics Migration with the Right Partner

Telematics migration is rarely as difficult as it looks from the outside. Operators who manage it well start with clear expectations, a phased plan, and a provider who has done this work before.

INVERS has helped operators migrate successfully for over 30 years in more than 60 countries. If you are considering a switch and want to know what your migration would look like, we’re happy to walk through it with you.

Related Posts

Car Sharing, Expert Interviews

Car Sharing & Public Transport: Teaming Up for Urban Mobility

We talked to Gunnar Nehrke, the managing director of the German Car Sharing Association, about Car Sharing & Public Transport. Learn how working together can create a convenient, affordable, and climate-friendly alternative to private car ownership.

INVERS webinar: How fleets are integrating EVs, with Modo, County of Ventura, AutoMobility Advisors, and INVERS.

Car Sharing, Shared Mobility

Webinar Recap: Lessons from the Front Lines: How Fleets Are Integrating EVs

Fleet leaders at Modo and the County of Ventura shared practical steps for expanding EV programs in shared and government fleets.

6 Examples of Public Transport Running a Car Sharing Service

Car Sharing

Car sharing & public transport: Examples of public transport running car sharing

Car sharing and public transport are often seen as competitors, but they are closely connected and can team up sustainable mobility. Here are 6 examples of public transport operator running their own car sharing service.